This is a weekend roundup of Bloomberg Tax Insights, which are written by practitioners featuring expert analysis on current issues in tax practice and policy. The articles featured here represent just a handful of the many Insights published each week. For a full archive of articles, browse by jurisdiction at Daily Tax Report, Daily Tax Report: State, and Daily Tax Report: International.

This week we look at the end of the tax world as we know it; business tax issues in divorce; the IRS’s attempt to pass an undesirable tax classification from father to son; the Connecticut pass-through entity tax; and tax authority investigations in Central Europe. We’ll hear from:

  • Steven Wrappe of Grant Thornton on how the OECD’s digital tax proposals will change the known tax world
  • Hobbs Gnaim of Chamberlain Hrdlicka on the potential tax pitfalls when separating business holdings in a divorce
  • Robert Willens on the IRS’s specious argument that an interest expense classification passes from father to son along with the associated partnership interests
  • Marc Finer of Murtha Cullina on the amendment to the Connecticut pass-through entity tax
  • Paulina Karpinska-Huzior and Andrzej Pośniak of CMS on tax authority inspections in Poland compared with other central European countries
Photographer: Jason Alden/Bloomberg

Steven C. Wrappe of Grant Thornton LLP looks at how the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development proposals will significantly change the tax landscape for multinational companies, and why the impact is unlikely to be limited to digitally derived income. Read: It’s the End of the World as We Know it—OECD Looks at Taxing Digital Profits

A divorce can be difficult enough as it is, especially when the couple holds significant assets. When business interests are involved, it can get much more complicated. Habeeb “Hobbs” Gnaim of Chamberlain Hrdlicka highlights some of the tax issues that need to be addressed, including tax indemnification, division or redemption of business ownership interests, and trusts involved with business entities. Read: Overlooked? During a Divorce, Don’t Forget About Tax Issues Related to Business Entities

The U.S. Tax Court recently rejected the IRS’s position that a son inherited his father’s investment interest classification—along with the associated partnership interests in several real estate investments. Robert Willens tells how the the court could find no support for the agency’s theory or resulting tax bill. Read: Son Didn’t ‘Inherit’ His Father’s Interest Expense Classification

Connecticut enacted a pass-through entity tax with an almost dollar-for-dollar credit intended to mitigate the federal state and local tax deduction limitation. The legislature then reduced the credit, effectively increasing the tax. Marc Finer of Murtha Cullina LLP explains the tax, the amendment, and the recently released Department of Revenue Services guidance allowing taxpayers to request a waiver of any late payment penalty or interest. Read: Legislative Changes Affecting Connecticut Pass-Through Entity Tax

Paulina Karpinska-Huzior and Andrzej Pośniak of CMS discuss how to prepare your business for the requirements of an inspection by the Polish tax authorities, and take a look at the requirements in Germany, Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Read: Preparing for Tax Inspection in Poland

From the Archive

Bloomberg Tax contributors have been discussing the multinational war on aggressive tax planning for some time.

Shiv Mahalingham of Deloitte LLP compared and contrasted the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines to the United Nations Practice Manual on Transfer Pricing.

Eric Vroemen of PwC Netherlands argued that while the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting initiative may restore the confidence of governments in the system for taxing multinational enterprises, the same confidence isn’t being achieved for the MNEs.

Beyond Tax

What’s happening outside the world of tax?

Many advocates in Big Law have said the flat fee payment model is superior to the traditional model of billable hours, but is that assertion actually true? Panasonic General Counsel Jessica Hodkinson takes a look at recent findings on flat fees, including data that shows they consistently outperform hourly rates on cost-effectiveness. Read: Who’s Afraid of Flat Fees? Not the GC of Panasonic

Exclusive Content for Bloomberg Tax Subscribers

(*Note: Your Bloomberg Tax log-in will be required to read the following content.)

The Treasury Department released final temporary regulations targeting “extraordinary” transactions. Jose Murillo and Craig Hillier of Ernst & Young LLP examine the regulations issued under new tax code Section 254A added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which provide two rules that would deny, in whole or in part, a deduction for eligible dividends received by a corporate U.S. shareholder. The authors find some problems, including that the regulations apply retroactively despite being issued without prior notice and almost 18 months after the TCJA was enacted, which is certain to raise issues under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Bloomberg Tax Insights articles are written by experienced practitioners, academics, and policy experts discussing developments and current issues in taxation. To contribute, please contact Erin McManus at emcmanus@bloombergtax.com.