A divided federal appeals court ordered a second look at a Muslim worker’s religious discrimination claim against the Energy Department, holding that her status as a pro se litigant made the difference.
The district court threw out Farah Naz’s bias charge without considering a supervisor’s alleged comment about “Islamic religious extremism” made in response to her request for a scheduling accommodation during the month of Ramadan, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said in a 2-1 ruling Tuesday.
“Granted, Naz did not include the allegation in her complaint, instead stating it in her opposition to the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.