This is a weekend roundup of Bloomberg Tax Insights, which are written by practitioners, featuring expert analysis on current issues in tax practice and policy. The articles featured here represent just a handful of the many Insights published each week. For a full archive of articles, browse by jurisdiction at Daily Tax Report, Daily Tax Report: State, and Daily Tax Report: International.
This week we look at defending the arm’s-length principle, composite returns for pass-through entities, the BEAT and the service-cost method, ignoring legislative intent in Pennsylvania, and more. We’ll hear from:
- Lorraine Eden of Texas A&M University on the arm’s-length standard as David against three Goliath criticisms
- Kelvin Lawrence of Dinsmore and Bruce Ely of Bradley Arant on composite returns for pass-through entities
- Kenneth Christman, Carlos Mallo, and Ioana Dermendjieva of EY on the final BEAT requirements for the transfer pricing service cost method exclusion
- Albert Feuer on the Department of Labor’s attempts to discourage ESG/sustainable investing
- Joe Bright and Heidi Schwartz of Cozen O’Connor on sourcing sales of services in Pennsylvania
- Marina Vishnepolskaya on what employers need to know about payroll tax deferral measures
- Eric Tresh, Todd Lard, and Charles Capouet of Eversheds Sutherland on upholding the Internet Tax Freedom Act
- Robert Willens on the taxability of a malpractice settlement payment from one’s accountant
While many rules have “gone out the window” since the pandemic began, some are worth keeping. Lorraine Eden of Texas A&M University says transfer pricing’s arm’s-length principle remains robust and flexible and defends it against three popular criticisms. Read: David and the Three Goliaths—Defending the Arm’s-Length Principle
An out-of-state taxpayer is challenging an Alabama statute that requires pass-through entities to pay a 5% income tax on the distributive shares of Alabama-source income flowing through to their nonresident owners. Kelvin Lawrence of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP and Bruce Ely of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP say the case is one to watch, because it is one of very few to focus on Commerce Clause discrimination claims against composite return statutes for pass-through entities and their nonresident owners. Read: Taxpayer Appeals Loss in Rare Constitutional Challenge to Composite Return Statute
The final base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) regulations impose specific eligibility and compliance requirements on taxpayers who would like to benefit from the service cost method (SCM) exclusion. Kenneth Christman, Carlos Mallo, and Joana Dermendjieva of EY review these requirements and compare them to the requirements for applying the SCM under the Treasury Regulations on Controlled Services Transactions. Read: A Little BEAT More on the Service Cost Method Exclusion
In June and in September, the Department of Labor proposed amendments to its regulations governing retirement plan fiduciaries. These amendments would discourage ESG/sustainable investing by prohibiting fiduciaries from making investment decisions that take into account any non-economic concerns. Albert Feuer queries whether there is a convincing legal basis for this policy. Read: DOL Lacks a Convincing Legal Basis for Attempts to Discourage ESG/Sustainable Investing
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court recently ruled that, for the purposes of apportioning corporate income before market-based sourcing was enacted, sales of services should be sourced to a state if the recipients of the services received the benefit of the services in that state. Joseph Bright and Heidi Schwartz of Cozen O’Connor say the ruling is contrary to legislative intent and, as it stands, would validate an incorrect interpretation of the statute, impede the attorney general, and undermine the effect of legislative changes to Pennsylvania statutes. Read: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Sustains Revenue’s Source Analysis
Last month, Treasury and the IRS issued guidance in the form of Notice 2020-65 implementing an executive order to defer employee payroll taxes as a temporary measure of economic relief from the Covid-19 pandemic. Marina Vishnepolskaya outlines what employers need to know. Read: IRS Guidance Implements Payroll Tax Deferral Measure
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently held that the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) preempted a state sales tax on Internet access charges in the first judicial decision to interpret the ITFA’s screening software provision. Eric Tresh, Todd Lard, and Charles Capouet of Eversheds Sutherland say the decision confirmed the common sense approach to ITFA’s screening software requirement. Read: Massachusetts Appeals Court Upholds Internet Access Tax Preemption Against Screening Software Challenge
If your accountant sets you up in a tax shelter that the IRS later disallows and then settles in your malpractice suit, you might end up owing tax on the settlement and owing the government’s litigation expenses. Robert Willens examines a recent case where the taxpayers ended up in such a position. Read: Accountant’s Settlement Payment Not Excluded From Gross Income
Navigating Virus Aid
We broke down major virus aid questions facing businesses in a five-part series. We also lay out what to expect from Congress with insight from Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners. Catch up on our deep dive.
Corporate Tax Chat: SōRSE Technology
Howard Lee, CEO of SōRSE Technology, a supplier of CBD products, told Bloomberg Tax that the pandemic is changing the outlook on legalization of THC—the active ingredient of cannabis products—not only when it comes to recovering tax revenue, but also when it comes to social justice issues. And outstanding issues from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could stymie innovation within the cannabis industry, he said. Read: Corporate Tax Chat with Howard Lee of SōRSE Technology
From the Archive
Bloomberg Tax contributors have described, discussed, analyzed, praised and criticized the arm’s-length standard in transfer pricing.
The OECD-led Inclusive Framework on base erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) continues its program of work on the tax challenges of digitalization. Jeff VanderWolk of Squire Patton Boggs wrote that the eventual policy must be based on reality and not such myths as that digital multinationals are not currently paying their fair share in market countries or that higher taxes won’t be passed on to consumers.
Transfer pricing has never been a static field, and recent global trends have significantly increased the uncertainty inherent in establishing appropriate intercompany pricing. Matthew Kramer, Steven C. Wrappe, and Matt Piper of Grant Thornton LLP examined the transfer pricing trends that are making advance pricing agreements look more like a necessity than a luxury.
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied certiorari to Altera Corp., now a subsidiary of Intel Corp., in its challenge to the validity of a transfer pricing Treasury regulation requiring related parties to share stock-based compensation. KPMG practitioners analyzed what the denial means going forward.
What’s happening outside the world of tax?
The legal tech industry is thriving and shifting attention to law firm clients—the ones who control the nearly $450 billion of annual spending that goes into law firms’ pockets, according to Nick Whitehouse, CEO of AI contract management service McCarthyFinch. Internal legal departments use AI technology for due diligence, as well as daily contract reviews to increase productivity and accuracy. Read: Legal AI 2.0 Is Now Appealing to the Masses
Covid-19 has changed the way we live and work and should be a catalyst for virtual options for critical government services. The federal government must take the lead to leverage existing technology so every benefit, permit, license, and registration that requires individuals to show up in person will be accessible virtually, says Cas Holloway, head of public enterprise at Unqork and former New York City deputy mayor for operations. Read: Covid-19 Will Spur Remote Government Civil Services
The pace of global M&A transactions is increasing due to impacts of the global pandemic, making it more important than ever for foreign investors and their counsel to understand changes made by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. StoneTurn partners offer ideas on how dealmakers and their counsel can prepare. Read: Export Controls Claim Spotlight as CFIUS Shifts Approach
California has created a new, beefed-up state financial regulatory agency to protect consumers. Matthew Kopko, vice president of public policy for DailyPay, says it puts tools in place for a fintech regulatory framework for the 21st century, and that all eyes will be on the enforcement actions taken by the new Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. Read: California Hits a Home Run With New Fintech Watchdog
Exclusive Content for Bloomberg Tax Subscribers
(*Note: Your Bloomberg Tax login will be required to read the following content.)
Treasury and the IRS released the final foreign derived intangible income (FDII) regulations on July 9. Gary Sprague of Baker McKenzie writes that the final regulations included an important improvement over the proposed regulations relating to how software transactions are classified under the FDII analytical framework, which applies separate rules to transactions in property and in services, and within the property category, to transactions in general property and intangible property.