A judge temporarily blocked President
In an early victory for the embattled economist, US District Judge
Cobb also concluded that “the public interest in Federal Reserve independence weighs in favor of Cook’s reinstatement.”
The Justice Department is likely to swiftly appeal the ruling and the US Supreme Court may ultimately have the final say.
WATCH: A judge temporarily blocked Trump from removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook. Valerie Tytel reports. Source: Bloomberg
The judge said that the alleged mortgage misconduct likely wasn’t enough for Trump to fire Cook under the Federal Reserve Act, because lawmakers intended for such cause to relate to behavior in office and “whether they have been faithfully and effectively executing their statutory duties.”
The government’s interpretation of the crucial phrase in the Federal Reserve Act “would allow the president to remove individuals even for arbitrary reasons provided that the president viewed the reasons as relevant to the individual’s ability or fitness to do the job,” Cobb wrote.
“Moreover, it would incentivize the president and subordinates to dig up prior conduct, however insubstantial, to justify removal from the board, even where the board member has been up to that point performing their statutory duties impeccably,” the judge said.
Cobb also ruled that the way in which Cook was dismissed — via a social media post by the president — likely violated her due process rights under the Constitution.
In a statement early Wednesday, White House spokesman Kush Desai said the president “lawfully removed Lisa Cook for cause due to credible allegations of mortgage fraud from her highly sensitive position overseeing financial institutions on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.”
Cook’s lawyer
“Allowing the president to unlawfully remove Governor Cook on unsubstantiated and vague allegations would endanger the stability of our financial system and undermine the rule of law,” Lowell said.
A Fed spokesperson declined to comment. The agency hasn’t taken a side in the legal fight and has said it will respect the court’s decision.
The Justice Department said that it doesn’t “comment on current or prospective litigation including matters that may be an investigation.”
Cook has alleged that Trump’s move to oust her is part of a politically motivated pattern. The president had previously considered an attempt to force out Fed Chair
Trump on Wednesday morning took to social media to again criticize the Fed and call for lower interest rates, without mentioning the ruling.
“Just out: No Inflation!!! ‘Too Late’ must lower the RATE, BIG, right now. Powell is a total disaster, who doesn’t have a clue!!!” Trump said.
Meanwhile, Trump’s pick to fill a vacancy on the Fed’s Board of Governors,
Trump said last month he was firing Cook after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director
The fight over whether Cook can keep her job has quickly emerged as the main flash point in Trump’s bid to assert more control over the Fed, which he has repeatedly called on to lower interest rates. In her lawsuit, Cook’s lawyer cast his attempt to fire her as a power grab that could cause “irreparable harm” to the US economy. Her lawyer has also said she never committed mortgage fraud.
Unintentional ‘Clerical Error’
Cook’s lawyers said that if there were any errors, she didn’t mean to deceive anyone, and no one was harmed. They have also suggested that an unintentional “clerical error” may be to blame and that the allegations were a pretext by Trump to remove her.
Following Pulte’s allegations, which he referred to the Justice Department, Trump wrote a letter to Cook saying that he was removing her immediately in light of her “deceitful and potentially criminal conduct in a financial matter.”
Meanwhile, the
In the ruling, the judge said that Pulte’s allegations in a social-media post, and Trump’s later social media post announcing his intention to dismiss Cook, didn’t amount to a proper notice of the allegations against Cook.
Cobb denied a request by the Justice Department to pause her ruling while it pursues an expected appeal, immediately teeing it up for the administration to take the case to higher courts.
(Updates with Trump call for lower interest rates, details from ruling.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Anthony Aarons
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.