The fate of recent Delaware amendments defining “controlling stockholder,” as well as Elon Musk’s status as a controller, remain to be adjudicated by the state’s high court. Meanwhile, the Court of Chancery is continuing to build on common law precedent and further delineating the requirements for “control.”
In a recent Chancery opinion, the nation’s premier business court held that an investor with a 41% stake in a company lacked the requisite control over a transaction that would necessitate application of the rigorous entire fairness standard.
Chancery is the same court that ruled that Musk was a controlling stockholder of ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.