Behind-the-scenes details of an agreement between Facebook and US privacy regulators in 2019 emerged in a Delaware court Wednesday, during a trial on investor claims the settlement cost them at least $7 billion.
A company director at the time,
Board members “felt it was important to get this behind us so we could focus on growth,” Zients said on the first day of an eight-day trial in Delaware Chancery Court. They believed Zuckerberg, as CEO, was essential to the business and “there wasn’t any indication” he personally had anything to do with the privacy missteps related to political consulting firm
A parade of Silicon Valley celebrities is expected to testify in the Meta trial over the next two weeks, led by Zuckerberg. Others on the witness list include the company’s former chief operating officer
The investors contend directors of the company hurt share prices through actions tied to the decade-old incident that resulted in
The suit alleges Meta directors engineered the company’s
Meta representatives didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about Zients’ testimony Wednesday.
Zuckerberg’s
A group of pension funds who hold Meta shares
The insider-trading claims prompted Zuckerberg to demand his stock-trading strategies be kept under seal in the trial. The tech titan moved to shield the price thresholds that trigger his automatic sales. The public can understand the allegations without that highly confidential information, he said in a court filing.
In early 2018, Facebook executives admitted Cambridge Analytica had been allowed to improperly gather data about tens of millions of the company’s users. Zuckerberg later apologized, acknowledging Facebook must better safeguard users’ information. A year later, the FTC announced the settlement over violations of the order under which Facebook would pay the $5 billion fine. Investors, including pension funds, filed suit in the wake of that order.
The case was filed as a derivative lawsuit, one that allows investors to sue company executives or board members on behalf of the company itself. Any recovery will go back to the company rather than any individual shareholder.
Zuckerberg, the 41-year-old CEO and chairman of Meta’s board, controls about 61% of the company’s voting power through a dual-class share structure, effectively granting him sole control over the board composition and corporate strategy — past, present and future. Repeated investor efforts to raise concerns about corporate governance have fallen flat due to his concentrated voting power.
Bloomberg Intelligence If Meta’s unable to knock out this case ahead of trial, it theoretically could face a $2 billion settlement,
The trial is being overseen by Chancellor
The wave of exits from Delaware, which funds more than a quarter of its budget with billions in corporate fees, led to a major overhaul of the state’s best-in-class corporate laws earlier this year. The changes were drafted by an expert panel that included former judges now practicing law at firms linked to Musk and Zuckerberg, including one involved in the Cambridge Analytica case.
Meta officials have publicly said they are weighing whether to
Last week, a venture capital firm co-founded by Meta director Andreessen cited a creeping pattern of uncertainty about how the law applies to startups and tech firms to explain its decision to relocate to Nevada.
The case is IN RE Facebook Inc. Derivative Litigation, 2018-0307, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington).
(Updates with additional Zients testimony.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Steve Stroth
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.