Statements about the Public Safety Power Shutoff program were too vague for a reasonable investor to have relied on them or establish falsity, Judge
“At best” for the investors leading the case, the challenged statements “would lead a reasonable investor to believe that Defendants’ PSPS operations were strong, but not perfect. At worst for Plaintiffs, the PSPS Statements would lead a reasonable ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.