Administrative Law Judge Christine Dibble on Tuesday rejected Starbucks’ argument that NLRB lawyers engaged in improper serial litigation because it raised the same allegation against the company in an Arizona-based case.
Just because NLRB lawyers litigated a charge that Starbucks violated federal labor law with its enforcement of a solicitation-and-distribution rule in one location doesn’t block agency lawyers from going after the company for illegally enforcing the rule at any of its ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.