The U.S. women’s soccer team lacks viable claims that they were paid less than the men’s team based on sex, because they were paid more overall and on a per game basis, the sport’s governing body told a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday.
The different collective bargaining agreements the women and men played under also doesn’t reflect sex bias in pay even though they include different terms, according to a brief the U.S. Soccer Federation Inc. filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The respective CBAs aren’t unequal on their face, as some ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.

