US to Accept Dreamers’ DACA Applications After 4-Year Freeze (2)

Sept. 30, 2025, 12:59 PM UTCUpdated: Sept. 30, 2025, 11:19 PM UTC

Young immigrants brought to the US without authorization as children could soon file new requests for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the Department of Homeland Security said, ending a long-running court imposed pause on the program.

The Trump administration said in a court filing Monday that it would resume processing of initial DACA applications in response to a federal appeals court’s January ruling. New requests for the protections had been blocked by a district court order since 2021. The government submitted the plan in response to a request for briefings on how the January decision should be carried out.

First launched in 2012, DACA offers protections from deportation and work eligibility to immigrants known as Dreamers who arrived in the US as children and were no older than 30 when it was set up. Legal battles over the Obama era-program have stretched back to the first Trump administration’s attempt to end the protections.

More than half a million current DACA recipients have continued to benefit from protections and employment authorization while litigation played out, although their long-term status has appeared increasingly uncertain. The plan to begin processing new applications is a rare win for immigrants amid broader Department of Homeland efforts since January to dismantle temporary humanitarian protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found DACA unlawful in January, but it kept a stay in place maintaining protections for now and narrowed what had been a nationwide injunction on new benefits to only Texas. Other GOP-led states suing to overturn the program had failed to show legal standing to challenge the program, the three-judge panel said.

Judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas, who issued the original injunction barring new applications in 2021, asked parties involved in the litigation to submit briefs on how it should be narrowed in light of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling.

US Citizenship and Immigration Services would adjudicate initial DACA applications filed before and after the 2021 injunction, the Trump administration said in Monday’s court filing. Applicants residing in Texas may only receive deferred action, not a work permit or lawful presence classification.

Relocating to the state risks DACA recipients’ continued employment authorization. Renewals for current DACA recipients will also continue, the government said.

Republican states opposing the program argued in a separate filing Monday that the DACA benefits should be wound down for recipients across the country in light of the Fifth Circuit’s finding that the program was unlawful. Immigrant intervenors represented by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said the court should clarify that the federal government is no longer barred from accepting and adjudicating new DACA applications after the appellate court decision. No initial applications have been approved since January, the group said.

MALDEF President and General Counsel Thomas Saenz said implementation of the Fifth Circuit decision will ultimately be decided by the district court.

“While the federal government provides somewhat detailed indications of how it proposes to withdraw work authorization from DACA holders in Texas, and of how it proposes to adjudicate new applications for DACA from throughout the country, including Texas, all of these proposals are just that,” he said in a statement. “They are not an indication of how actual implementation will proceed.”

USCIS didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the timeline for the plan if approved by the court.

The Justice Department represents DHS in the case. States involved in the litigation are represented by their respective attorneys general offices. Defendant intervenors defending the program are represented by MALDEF, Ropes and Gray LLP, and Garcia & Garcia, attorneys at Law PLLC.

The case is Texas v. US, S.D. Tex., No. 1:18-cv-00068, response filed 9/29/25.

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Kreighbaum in Washington at akreighbaum@bloombergindustry.com

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga at jcasuga@bloomberglaw.com; Genevieve Douglas at gdouglas@bloomberglaw.com

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.