The false arrests at the center of the underlying claims all stemmed from the same acts or general conditions—Hertz’s theft-prevention policy and practices—and therefore should be treated as one “occurrence” triggering the insurers’ duty to pay for the settlement, Allan Moore of Covington & Burling LLP, arguing for Hertz, told the Delaware Supreme Court at a hearing Wednesday.
But Hertz’s corporate policy ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.