The Trump administration was ordered by an appeals court to facilitate the return of a Venezuelan man who was
In a 2-1 ruling, the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals Monday refused to block a judge’s order seeking the return of a 20-year-old man deported despite a pending asylum case and protections under a class-action settlement for unaccompanied immigrant children.
President
Read More:
US officials had said the man, referred to as Cristian, had ties to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua — designated a terrorist organization by US officials — and so could be removed under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. The US has previously invoked the law three times in its history, and only in cases of declared war.
But a district judge earlier ruled that the class-action settlement involving Cristian made no exceptions for gang affiliation or national security.
Judges
“As is becoming far too common, we are confronted again with the efforts of the Executive Branch to set aside the rule of law in pursuit of its goals,” Gregory wrote. “It is the duty of courts to stand as a bulwark against the political tides that seek to override constitutional protections and fundamental principles of law, even in the name of noble ends like public safety.”
On Friday, the Supreme Court extended an order that blocked the administration from using the wartime law to send about 176 alleged Venezuelan gang members to a notorious El Salvador prison. The court said the government hadn’t given them an adequate chance to challenge their deportations.
The administration has insisted it is unable to bring back Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man the administration acknowledged was wrongly deported to El Salvador in March. The Supreme Court told the government last month to try to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia.
At a recent hearing, US District Judge
In the Cristian ruling, Judge Julius Richardson dissented, saying it is a contract case that does not dispute whether Trump properly invoked the Alien Enemies Act. He said that US District Judge
Richardson, a Trump appointee, wrote: “Cristian presents a contract claim, not a quarrel with the Alien Enemies proclamation. Yet in resolving the contract dispute, the district court entangled the judiciary in the roil of foreign affairs.”
The case is JOP v. United States Department of Homeland Security, 25-1519, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Peter Blumberg
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.