An
The worker argued that because a collective bargaining agreement preempts a clause in onboarding documents promising compensation for missed meal breaks, including the clause ran afoul of California’s unfair competition law. But preemption doesn’t make the clause itself unlawful, and that same preemption blocks arguments that the clause was unfair or fraudulent, the US District Court for the Central District of California said Wednesday.
- Plaintiff Joseph Martinez, whose latest complaint alleges onboarding ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.