The US District Court for the Central District of California lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute, as Plaintiff Peter Dawidzik failed to sufficiently allege an injury in fact—one that was concrete and not speculative, Judge Kenly Kiya Kato ruled Monday. Kato left leave to amend.
Kato said the Ninth Circuit already rejected a broad theory of free roaming privacy rights in Popa v. Microsoft Corp. similar ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
