Skincare-products maker Musely can’t force a plaintiff to take her website-wiretapping claims against the company to arbitration rather than pursuing them as a proposed class action in federal court.
A lower court properly found that Musely couldn’t enforce the arbitration agreement contained in its website’s terms of service because the site didn’t provide adequate notice of the agreement, a panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said Monday in a per curiam opinion.
Elia Ramirez sued Musely, also known as Trusper Inc., in April 2024, alleging the company violated several California privacy laws by embedding surveillance ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.