Insurers fighting coverage for stoneworker injury claims in a California federal court are arguing that a ruling in favor of a policyholder in a similar case in the same court is irrelevant to disputes with their policyholders.
Judge John F. Walter held Dec. 22 that a silica exclusion didn’t preclude carriers from having to defend a stone product manufacturer in stoneworker litigation. But that involves different policy language, different parties, and a different product than the cases before Judge Mónica Ramírez Almadani,
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.