Board members enacted this retail investor voting program as a “blatant power grab,” a pension fund told the US District Court for the District of New Jersey. Through it, they “seek to weaponize retail shareholder apathy by sock-puppeting retail shareholders’ voting discretion without providing the required disclosures under federal law, in order to crush the voting impact of security holders who read the proxy statements, participate in shareholder democracy, and legally vote their shares,” said the complaint ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.