Trump on Tuesday asked for the delay as part of a bid to overturn his conviction after the high court ruled he has at least some immunity from prosecution for official actions he took as president. Prosecutors said in their own letter to Judge
Read more:
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision on Monday came in the federal criminal case against Trump for overturning the 2020 election results, but his New York lawyers contend it covers some evidence and testimony in the hush-money case.
The decision now rests with Merchan, who oversaw the New York trial and will most likely delay the sentencing to hear arguments on whether the verdict should be tossed. He may schedule a hearing in the matter, setting up another high-stakes clash between Trump and Manhattan prosecutors, who were the first to file criminal charges against the former president.
A spokesperson for Merchan didn’t immediately return an email seeking comment about the case.
District Attorney
A Manhattan jury on May 30 found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to an adult-film star on the eve of the 2016 presidential election. Trump’s lawyers argue that in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on presidential immunity, key evidence and witness testimony tainted the trial.
‘Official Acts’
Jurors heard testimony and saw documents that could be evidence of “official acts” and might be barred under the Supreme Court ruling, according to the letter from Trump lawyers
Much of the trial testimony, however, centered around actions by Trump before he took office.
Cohen testified he repeatedly discussed Daniels with Trump, who blessed the repayment scheme. He said Trump authorized a plan to reimburse Cohen a total of $420,000, covering the Daniels check, payments for another vendor, an allotment for taxes and a bonus. Prosecutors argued Trump reimbursed Cohen for the hush-money scheme with several payments recorded as “legal services” in company books.
Prosecutors alleged that the case centered around an agreement between Trump, Cohen and former National Enquirer publisher
(Updates with background on case beginning in 10th paragraph.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
David Voreacos, Anthony Aarons
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.