The Connecticut Superior Court Feb. 25 issued a decision granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to liability on her Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) claim based on defendant requiring her to pay excessive marshal fees, but denied plaintiff’s motion as to the collection fees. The Court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the collection fees claim, finding that those fees were authorized by statute. [Dexter, et. al. v. Benchmark Mun. Tax Servs., Conn. Super. Ct., No. X07-HHD-CV23-6177740-S, 02/25/25]
This story was produced by Bloomberg Tax Automation, and edited by Bloomberg Tax staff.
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.