The Canadian Official Gazette Feb. 18 published Act No. R.S.C., 1985, c. 2, on the consolidated text of the Income Tax Application Rules, current as of Feb. 4. [Canada, Government ...

The Canadian Official Gazette Feb. 18 published Act No. R.S.C., 1985, c. 1, on the consolidated text of the Income Tax Act, current as of Feb. 4. [Canada, Government Legal ...

The Montenegrin Parliament (Skupstina) Feb. 16 accepted for consideration Bill No. 19-6/26-2, amend the Law on Contributions for Mandatory Social Insurance. The bill includes measures to: 1) introduce a mandatory ...

The Austrian Federal Ministry of Finance Feb. 18 posted Federal Finance Court Decision No. RV/7100468/2018, clarifying the deductibility of guaranteed payments as business expenses for the managing director and shareholder ...

The Canadian Official Gazette Feb. 18 published Regulation No. C.R.C., c. 945, on the consolidated text of the Income Tax Regulations, current as of Feb. 4. [Canada, Government Legal Database, ...

The French General Directorate of Public Finance Feb. 18 updated the administrative doctrine on meal expense deductions, with the 2026 values for taxpayers subject to the commercial profits tax (BIC) ...

Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont (D) said his state is willing to take the lead in regulating popular prediction markets even if it could run afoul of federal authorities.

The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts adopted amendments to the franchise tax regulation. The regulation implements various legislative changes from 2011 to 2023, revises the interpretation of conformity to the ...

The Nevada Tax Commission proposed regulations relating to tobacco taxation. The proposal creates provisions governing contested cases involving tobacco licensees and manufacturers, administrative proceedings for license suspensions, and the removal ...

Two casinos near Shreveport, La., won’t have to pay $6.67 million in sales and occupancy taxes after a state tribunal ruled in a opinion released Thursday that the rooms they provided for free aren’t taxable.

The Texas Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court properly denied a plea to the jurisdiction raised by the Harris Central Appraisal District (HCAD). HCAD contended that the taxpayer ...

The Virginia Attorney General (AG) has issued an official advisory opinion that addressed questions from the Stafford County Treasurer regarding the 2017 amendment to Virginia Code § 15.2-2286(B). The amendment ...

President Donald Trumprushed to salvage his signature tariffs after the Supreme Court struck down his global duties, pledging he would use different tools to work around the ruling and preserve import taxes he has cast as essential to his economic and foreign policy.

The US Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, undercutting his signature economic policy and delivering his biggest legal defeat since he returned to the White House.

Mindful of voters’ concerns about inflation, the administration may not rush to bring back all the duties.

The US Department of Justice lost its bid to have the Eighth Circuit reconsider its decision rejecting an IRS “arms length” adjustment to 3M Co.‘s taxes in a case involving royalties from the company’s Brazilian subsidiary.

In invoking what he claimed were virtually unlimited powers to impose tariffs under a 1977 emergency law, US President Donald Trump took unprecedented action. Now, the Supreme Court has determined that it was illegal, too.

The Supreme Court’s decision to nullify a large swath of the Trump administration’s tariffs cleared the way for companies to seek refunds for tariffs already paid, which could come with a slew of transfer pricing issues for them to navigate.

The Supreme Court’s decision that President Donald Trump illegally imposed tariffs on US trading partners under the guise that America’s trade deficit amounts to a national emergency is a victory for the rule of law. As such, it’s also a win for the country’s reputation as a destination for global capital. Financial markets should celebrate — but not too much.

The Advocate General opinion in the Stellantis Portugal case is one interpretation of whether transfer pricing adjustments are subject to value-added tax, but such analyses are highly fact-dependent.

Corporations need to be careful if they try to reclassify charitable contributions as ordinary and necessary business expenses under the 2025 federal tax law.

Transfer pricing trends increase advanced pricing agreements appeal for taxpayers seeking certainty amid heightened enforcement risks.

AI in tax is a redesign challenge, not a replacement threat. When AI is aligned with high volume processes, tax departments gain speed, consistency, and audit readiness.

A resolution requiring Washington, DC, to change its tax code to align with President Donald Trump’s signature 2025 tax law will have an immediate and destabilizing effect on taxpayers—especially families already operating with little margin for financial error.