Bloomberg Tax
Free Newsletter Sign Up
Bloomberg Tax
Welcome
Go
Free Newsletter Sign Up

INSIGHT: Free Trade Zones—a Potential Opportunity for the U.K.?

March 5, 2020, 8:00 AM

In February 2020, the U.K. government issued a consultation on reintroducing freeports as part of its post-Brexit international trade strategy.

As a member of the EU, the U.K. has been unable to negotiate its own individual trade agreements and it is possible that non-EU countries such as the U.S., Canada, Australia and India, and emerging markets in Africa and South America, present significant trading opportunities that can be better developed when the U.K. is able to negotiate its own, bespoke trade terms, unrestricted by EU frameworks.

One area of potential opportunity which would be possible if the U.K. left the Single Market and Customs Union would be to reinstate free trade zones (FTZs) in the U.K. The government has begun a period of consultation to assess the merits and feasibility of such a move.

At the same time, the U.K. has a significant amount of trade with the EU which U.K. businesses will want to maintain once it has left the EU. Given the U.K.’s close physical proximity to the EU, it is well placed to continue to sell into those markets and the use of FTZs could help to incentivize businesses to remain in the U.K. (rather than relocate to the EU), or even attract new investment from foreign companies that could expand by using the U.K. as a base for selling into the EU, as well as the home U.K. market.

What is a Free Trade Zone?

FTZs are designed to both facilitate international trade and to promote economic development of the region in which they are located. There are currently no operational FTZs in the U.K.; while there are a number of ports which have been authorized in the past, none have active authorizations. Post-Brexit, the U.K. could have the freedom to set its own trade policy and to reintroduce FTZs.

An FTZ is an area that is physically within a country but legally outside of it for tax purposes. An FTZ would need to be a designated physical area. It would not be a single building but a geographical location.

It would most likely entail an enclosed area where the flow of goods and people entering and exiting could be controlled. This is important, as there would be a need to prevent criminal behavior relating to the illegal entry of people or to the unpaid import taxes for goods.

Put simply, an FTZ allows goods to be imported, manufactured, processed and re-exported without the payment of import taxes, which only fall due when the goods are removed from the zone and entered into the domestic economy. The FTZ may also offer tax incentives such as lower corporation or payroll taxes. It may also include non-tax incentives such as grants for research and development activities.

FTZs used Widely Across the World

Worldwide, FTZs are a “well-trodden path,” so there is plenty of practical experience on which the U.K. could draw. They are used widely across the world, particularly in the U.S., South America, Canada and Asia. Official figures are hard to come by but it is thought that several thousand FTZs exist globally. The precise format varies, but it is very common for governments to use FTZs to encourage local business and economic investment.

Removal of Technical Barriers

Whilst the EU has permitted several FTZs to be established in the EU, for example at Shannon Airport and in Katowice, it has been very difficult for governments to do so because of EU state aid rules. Under these rules a measure constitutes (illegal) state aid if it:

  • involves the transfer of state resources;
  • has potential distortive effects on competition and trade in the EU market; and
  • confers a selective advantage to the recipients.

Once outside of the EU, the U.K. may not be subject to the EU state aid restrictions, which would allow the government the freedom to introduce one or more FTZs in the U.K. as part of its international trade strategy.

Level of Support and Incentives

The level of tax support and other incentives would need careful consideration. The payment of import duty is a cost that cannot be reclaimed by businesses, so a likely approach would be to reduce the level of U.K. corporate income tax within the FTZ to an amount that counters the financial burdens of increased duty tariffs, given that all trade between the U.K. and other countries would lead to imports into those markets and be potentially subject to duty, unless free trade agreements are reached.

Other incentives of FTZs could take the form of:

  • reduced payroll taxes;
  • grants for research and development spend; and/or
  • reduced regulatory compliance requirements.

There continues to be much debate about the amount of taxes paid by multinational companies around the world and the U.K. government would most likely want to avoid setting itself up as an offshore tax haven. Such a move could risk inflaming relationships with the EU and probably provoke higher import tariffs on goods shipped from the U.K. into the EU.

Ultimately, the U.K. would have freedom to shape an FTZ and the tax and other incentives that are offered. Indeed, if there were multiple FTZs within the U.K., each could have a slightly different set of incentives if that were thought to be appropriate.

Summary

FTZs are generally regarded as supporting the export market. This is an area that the U.K. aims to grow, both in volume and value, by being outside of the EU and therefore able to negotiate its own trade deals. As well as being a designated area that is free of import duties, additional benefits such as tax and regulatory incentives could be offered in order to retain businesses in the U.K. or, more optimistically, encourage additional investment in the U.K.

FTZs could have a significant role to play as part of the government’s post-Brexit international trade strategy.

Robert Marchant is VAT Partner at national audit, tax, advisory and risk firm, Crowe.

The author may be contacted at: robert.marchant@crowe.co.uk

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. or its owners.