Bloomberg Tax
March 19, 2020, 7:01 AM

Tax Rules Relating to Cross-Border Relocations to Switzerland

Silvia Zimmermann
Silvia Zimmermann
Bloomberg Tax International Forum
Jonas  Sigrist
Jonas Sigrist
Pestalozzi Attorneys at Law Ltd

For decades, the Bloomberg Tax International Forum has convened international tax experts from all over the globe. In this series, Forum members will regularly share their views on current and important topics. Read the full archive of the Bloomberg Tax International Forum articles here.

Switzerland has a small domestic market and headquarters and regional hubs of many multinational enterprises and trading companies. One of the key drivers of Switzerland’s business friendly environment is its competitive tax system.

When relocating business operations and other functions, the prospect of achieving a tax neutral step-up in basis allowing for subsequent tax-deductible amortization often plays an important role.

The Swiss corporate tax reform that became effective as of January 1, 2020, provides for new rules for cross-border re-locations, enhancing tax attractiveness and legal certainty. This paper focuses on the tax rules concerning re-locations of business operations, other assets, and mere functions from abroad to Switzerland.

“Step-up” in Basis on Financial Statements

Swiss corporate income taxation generally takes place based on the financial statements drawn up in accordance with Swiss statutory accounting law, unless there is a divergent tax provision (such as the new tax step-up rules shown in the next section).

Therefore, it is possible to achieve a step-up in basis for tax purposes by relocating assets to Switzerland by way of a transaction that allows for capitalization of the assets transferred at fair market value in the Swiss statutory financial statements.


When a foreign direct or indirect shareholder contributes an asset to a Swiss subsidiary—be it against the issuance of shares or just as a contribution to the Swiss subsidiary’s reserves—the Swiss subsidiary may reflect the fair market value of the contributed assets in its statutory financial statements.

The contribution is income tax neutral at the level of the Swiss subsidiary. This applies even if the effect is a tax neutral step-up in basis and regardless of whether there is a step-up in basis at the level of the contributing shareholder and the tax treatment at the level of the contributing shareholder.

Switzerland levies a 1% issuance stamp duty on the fair market value of assets contributed by the immediate shareholder to a Swiss share corporation, limited liability company, or cooperative.
However, there are several exceptions when the 1% issuance stamp duty does not apply in the context of re-locations and restructurings. Specifically, the contribution of assets that serve business operations of the Swiss subsidiary as well as the contribution of shares representing at least 10% of the capital and/or profit rights in a company are exempt from the issuance stamp duty.


When a foreign subsidiary distributes an asset to its Swiss parent company, the Swiss parent may reflect the distributed asset at fair market value in its statutory financial statements. To the extent that the distribution does not give rise to an impairment requiring a tax-deductible depreciation of the shareholding, the distribution results in taxable income for the Swiss parent.

Provided the shareholding represents at least 10% of the capital and/or profit rights in the distributing company or has a fair market value of at least 1 million Swiss Francs (approximately $1 million), the Swiss parent is eligible for the participation reduction, which generally results in a virtual tax exemption of the dividend income.

Because Switzerland has no controlled foreign corporation (CFC) legislation, the participation reduction applies regardless of taxation at the level of the distributing subsidiary. An anti-hybrid rule requires that the distributing foreign subsidiary does not deduct the distribution amount as a tax-deductible expense.

Other Transactions

A Swiss company may also achieve a “step-up” in basis by purchasing assets at fair market value. Assets sales resulting in a step-up in basis usually give rise to income taxation at the level of the selling entity and are therefore often not a viable option.

Swiss law generally allows the merger of non-Swiss entities into Swiss entities and the relocation of foreign entities to Switzerland whereby the relocating company converts into a company under Swiss law. For such cross-border relocations, the figures reflected in the foreign statutory financials before the relocation to Switzerland are generally decisive as the basis also in Switzerland. That is, a step-up is only possible for statutory accounting purposes if a revaluation takes place before the relocation to Switzerland. Moreover, cross-border immigration mergers and re-domiciliation are rather complex transactions involving considerable time and costs.

For relocations not involving a transfer of specific assets, such as the mere shift of the place of effective management or of other functions to Switzerland, a step-up in basis is not possible for Swiss statutory accounting purposes.

As a result, contributions and (depending on the group structure and jurisdictions involved) distributions are often the only efficient way to achieve a tax neutral step-up in basis in the Swiss statutory financials.

Swiss statutory accounting law provides for significant discretion regarding the capitalization of specific items. When acquiring intangibles, a company may often choose whether it capitalizes the entire value of intangibles related to the same business operations as one single position (i.e. as IP), or allocates the value to several items such as trademarks, patents, and goodwill. Such itemization of assets affects the amortization rates (outlined in the section below).

We recommend careful consideration of the itemization of the capitalized assets in order to make use of the most tax-efficient amortization period.

“Step-up” in Basis for Tax Purposes

As from 2020, it is clearly possible to achieve a tax neutral step-up in basis for mere tax purposes upon the relocation of assets, business operations, and/or functions from abroad to Switzerland. This includes any transaction resulting in the relevant assets or functions becoming subject to Swiss income tax, e.g. cross-border mergers, re-domiciliation, a shift of the place of effective management to Switzerland, acquisition of assets below market value, or a mere transfer of business functions not involving any immediate asset transfer.

It has been disputed whether the new rule only applies to relocations to Switzerland within the same legal entity. In our view—which is in line with the wording of the new provision and recent doctrine—a step-up in basis for tax purposes also applies to relocations of assets or functions from other legal entities.

Nevertheless, relocations within the same legal entity are certainly most relevant for a mere tax step-up because the transfer of assets from another entity generally allows for a step-up in the statutory financial statements (as outlined above).

Any kind of assets and functions including mere goodwill may benefit from such tax-neutral step-up in basis, except for shareholdings of at least 10%. Unlike to most other assets, shareholdings must not be depreciated in value for Swiss tax purposes unless their actual value decreases.

Capital gains derived from sales of such shareholdings are generally tax exempt because of the participation reduction (while the re-capture of depreciations is subject to income tax at federal level and in some cantons). Therefore, a step-up in basis for shareholdings of at least 10% would usually not be beneficial for Swiss income tax purposes.

The Swiss tax authorities generally require a valuation to provide for a “step-up” in basis. For this purpose, established valuation methods such as the discounted cash flow method are generally accepted. The value must be allocated to the specific assets relocated to Switzerland, even if the relevant assets cannot be capitalized for statutory accounting purposes. Only to the extent that such allocation is not possible, the exceeding value shall be itemized under the position goodwill.

Tax Amortization Rules

Swiss statutory accounting law is governed by the lowest value principle. That is, it does not limit the amount of consistently applied amortizations. For tax purposes, however, amortizations must be based on business reasons.

In this context, the Swiss Federal Tax Administration issued guidelines providing for safe harbor tax amortization rates. Within these safe harbor rates, amortizations are accepted for Swiss tax purposes. If a company wishes to use higher amortization rates or provide for an additional extraordinary depreciation, it must be able to demonstrate that this is justified due to an actual value decrease of the relevant asset. The table outlines safe harbor tax amortization rates for certain categories of assets.

The safe harbor amortization rate for intangibles applies to any kind of intangibles that serve a business purpose and can be capitalized, including patents, trademarks, licenses, copyrights, any other right, acquired goodwill, and product related research and development (R&D).

There are generally no minimum amortization rates for tax purposes. Minimum amortization rates are governed by the lowest value and prudence principles under statutory accounting law, requiring that assets with a limited lifetime are subject to consistently applied amortizations and that the value recorded in the statutory financials does not exceed the assets’ fair market value.

The minimum statutory amortization and depreciation required for Swiss statutory accounting purposes are generally also binding for tax purposes. If a company does not expense an amortization or depreciation in the period in which this would be required under Swiss statutory accounting law, rectifying such amortization or depreciation in a later period is generally not accepted for tax purposes.

No regular amortization is required for assets that have no limited lifetime. This applies to real estate and permanent rights in real estate if accounted for as a separate position without buildings, as well as other rights without any date of expiry such as trademarks. Mere goodwill, however, is always deemed to have a limited useful lifetime (even if obviously related to an eternally calculated future free cash flow). Acquired goodwill must usually be amortized over a period of 5–10 years.

The newly implemented tax provisions allowing an income tax neutral step-up in basis for mere tax purposes refers to the general amortization rules mentioned above. Regarding hidden reserves created by the relevant company itself, which are being tax disclosed tax neutrally because of the step-up, however, the new provisions require full amortization within 10 years. 10 years is the maximum amortization accepted for tax purposes. Alternatively, a company may still apply a shorter safe haven amortization period, or a shorter period if required due to an actual value decrease.

Companies usually wish to make (high) amortizations as soon as possible (i.e. at the maximum allowed safe harbor amortization rates) in order to achieve a lower actual income tax burden in earlier periods. Swiss corporate income tax law allows carrying tax losses forward to the subsequent seven years. No such time limitation applies with respect to income realized in order to recapitalize a company in financial distress. There is no possibility at all to carry back tax losses to previous tax years.

In the context of the relocation of significant assets, operations, and/or functions to Switzerland, a step-up in basis may result in a situation where a company’s amortization expenses for the assets benefiting from the fair value step-up are higher than the regular income from these assets or from other operations.

This may result in tax losses during the first years after relocating to Switzerland, which cannot necessarily be set-off against future profits in view of the seven years tax loss carry forward period.

Against this background, a company may wish to extend the amortization over a longer period that it is provided for by the safe harbor tax amortization rates. Such longer amortization period is generally admissible provided that it does not result in the relevant assets being over-valued.

In this context, it may help to allocate certain values to specific assets with a long or eternal lifetime. For example, instead of capitalizing a single position IP, which should usually be amortized within some 5–15 years based on the prudence principle, a company may allocate a part of the value to patents (which may be amortized over their entire expected useful lifetime, which usually equals the end of patent protection) and to trademarks (which do not require any amortization at all as long as the income linked to the trademarks remains stable).

Silvia Zimmermann is Counsel and Jonas Sigrist is a Partner at Pestalozzi Attorneys at Law Ltd, Zurich.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. or its owners.

Read the full archive of the Bloomberg Tax International Forum articles here.

Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Tax

From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.