The Arizona Court of Appeals permanently enjoined the City of Scottsdale from including a proposed ballot measure on the November 2024 ballot due to misleading language. The proposed ballot measure sought to replace and reduce an expiring 0.20 percent transaction privilege tax to 0.15 percent for 30 years for parks and recreational facilities. The court found the term “replace” was not misleading, but the term “reduce” was misleading because it failed to properly disclose the proposition’s principal provisions and essential changes by describing it as a tax reduction. [Lane v. City of Scottsdale, Ariz. Ct. App., No. 1 CA-CV 24-0545 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.