Property tax challenges filed by
The companies sought refunds of $10.6 million, $1.47 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, for fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. They alleged Santa Clara County violated the state constitution by taxing their property at a higher debt-service tax rate than a non-utility property.
The California Sixth District Court of Appeal rejected the utilities’ interpretation of the constitutional provision on Friday, reversing a trial court’s ruling denying the county’s motion to dismiss. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
