The Connecticut Supreme Court appeared skeptical Wednesday of the state tax department’s argument that the estate of a health-care executive who owned houses in multiple states was subject to a $13.2 million estate tax bill after his death.
Jack Anderson’s estate argued he showed every indication of intending to have a Florida domicile when he died, and didn’t enter Connecticut for the last 147 days of his life. The Connecticut Department of Revenue Services countered that intent isn’t a dispositive factor.
“Then the estate can never win, really, given that it’s a clear and convincing standard there’s a huge amount ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
