Smithfield’s franchise tax liability for 2014 will decrease about $940,000, by the company’s calculations, after the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County ruled late Thursday that the company may use the three-factor apportionment formula—which considers the location of a taxpayer’s payroll, property, and sales—rather than the standard formula that considers only sales.
Judge Gary D. Roberts also struck down a California Franchise Tax Board regulation ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
