The definition of “intangible” doesn’t include residual-business assets for purposes of valuing pre-existing intangibles under then-applicable transfer pricing regulations, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held. Amazon.com, Inc. entered into a cost sharing arrangement in which a holding company for European subsidiaries made a “buy-in” payment for the company’s assets that met the regulatory definition of “intangible” under tax code
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.