A rule used by multiple appellate courts for deciding who owns a refund doesn’t align with the nation’s tax laws, a petitioner told the U.S. Supreme Court.
In his quest for a $4 million refund, Simon E. Rodriguez, the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of a parent company called United Western Bancorp Inc., told the high court that a rule lower courts use to assume a refund belongs to a subsidiary unless they see clear agreement to something else “is irreconcilable with the scheme that the IRS designed for assigning tax refunds.”
Rodriguez pointed to to how ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.