Senate Republican leaders continue to scrounge for votes to pass
Senators voted through Monday night and into Tuesday morning on a series of amendments to the massive bill, including proposed energy and health care provisions that could further fan the flames of division in a party split over cuts to social safety-net programs, clean energy tax credits from the previous administration and the
There are currently eight major Republican holdouts, and Senate Majority Leader
Winning Paul’s vote would require removing the $5 trillion debt ceiling increase in the bill and risking a US payment default as soon as August.
Trump, leaving the White House Tuesday morning, expressed optimism, telling reporters “I think we’re going to get there. It’s tough. We’re trying to bring it down, bring it down so it’s really good for the country.”
Treasury Secretary
Before the Senate even gets to an up-or-down vote on the legislation, lawmakers must work their way through dozens of amendments, the vast majority of which will fail. But the outcome of some of these votes will test Trump’s limits as a dealmaker and could ultimately determine the fate of his bill.
“The Republicans are still in disarray,” Senate Democratic Leader
WATCH: Senate Republican leaders continue to search for votes to pass Donald Trump’s $3.3 trillion tax and spending bill. Tyler Kendall reports. Source: Bloomberg
One amendment on artificial intelligence, however, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. Senators voted 99-1 early Tuesday to strip a measure that would have prevented US states from regulating AI. That marked a setback for technology companies and Trump allies in Silicon Valley who had pushed for a regulatory pause of the nascent technology.
Read more:
Clean Energy
A group of Senate Republicans is
The amendment being circulated by Republican
Ernst’s language, supported by key holdout
Under the current version of the Senate bill, qualifying projects would have to be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify.
The Ernst amendment would shift to a more lenient timetable tied to the start of construction, allowing projects to qualify for at least some of the credit as long as they begin construction in 2026 or 2027.
If adopted, however, the change could displease fiscal conservatives who have insisted on the more stringent requirements to qualify for the tax credits. The chamber’s leadership has focused on getting Murkowski’s vote with long conversations on the Senate floor.
Rural Hospitals
Democrats, angered by the Medicaid cuts in the bill, voted to defeat an amendment from Republican
Many rural lawmakers are concerned that the Medicaid cuts, if enacted, would force hospitals in sparsely populated areas to close even with the new dedicated aid fund.
Medicaid Cuts
A group of conservatives including
Thune told reporters he’d back the amendment but said he couldn’t guarantee it would pass.
If it fails, it remains unclear how this block of conservatives will vote on final passage. And if it passes, it could spark a rebellion from moderates like Collins and Murkowski.
‘Wraparound’ Amendment
As leaders continue to twist arms on the bill itself, they also need to ensure they have enough votes on a final “wraparound” amendment tweaking the legislation ahead of a vote on final passage.
Part of the calculus is to strip language that could threaten the bill’s odds in the House, which is planning to vote on the Senate measure later this week. The House’s own version of the bill passed by a single vote.
The Senate’s deeper Medicaid cuts — which caused Tillis to defect — will put pressure on swing-district Republicans, while Freedom Caucus hardliners are angry that the Senate bill would create larger deficits than the House-passed measure.
At least one New York Republican — Representative
Yet so far, unlike in 2017, Trump has been able to corral his party at the end, with only a few willing to buck the pressure to vote for his signature legislation.
(Updates to add Trump, Bessent remarks.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Laura Davison, John Harney
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Tax
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.