The U.S. Tax Court held that a taxpayer’s microcaptive insurance arrangement lacked economic substance under section 7701(o) and upheld the imposition of 40 percent accuracy-related penalties under section 6662(b)(6) and (i) for nondisclosed noneconomic substance transactions. Taxpayers, through their closely held S corporation, paid premiums to related captive insurers and claimed deductions for those premiums as insurance expenses. In a prior opinion, the court determined that those payments were not deductible and sustained 20 percent accuracy-related penalties. Following additional briefing, the court concluded the arrangement failed both prongs of the economic substance test. The court applied the increased 40 percent ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.