- Inspectors general, congressional panel unnamed as money flows
- Calls for oversight to start as Treasury, Fed spend billions
The last time Congress disgorged billions of dollars to treat a national emergency, some of the money went to an evening reception for housing counselors who enjoyed strawberry shortcake martinis and were served from a carved beef station.
Such questionable spending would be a plum target for watchdogs charged with monitoring the $2 trillion coronavirus relief voted by Congress. But first they’ll have to be assigned to the job. Three weeks
Congress is out of town until next month, while a congressional panel that is to have five members limps along with one appointee, who has no staff and can wield
“The money is already out the door, and there’s no one watching where it’s going,” said
The sooner oversight begins, the better, according to Christy Goldsmith Romero, special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program -- the program known as TARP that Congress
Early in TARP’s life, the inspector general’s office helped ensure aid money flowed quickly, offering advice on loosening overly strict credit-eligibility criteria and cutting needless regulations, Romero said.
“The other thing that’s really important to jump on right away are the scams,” Romero said in an interview. “There’s bound to be fraud whenever there’s that much money going out the door.”
Already, the Small Business Administration said a $349 billion relief program for small businesses has
The overlapping oversight entities have yet to gain traction.
No confirmation hearing has been set in the
Miller has started interviewing candidates to start building his team, according to a person familiar with the matter. He is looking to hire lawyers, experts in financial forensics and legislative experts, the person said.
Separately, House Speaker
Responsibilities of the special inspector general include overseeing disbursements by the Treasury Department -- money flowing to big businesses including
Similarly, nobody’s been named to head the Pandemic Relief Accountability Committee, a body made up of inspectors general from throughout the government. It was to be headed by an inspector general who drew praise from Democrats before
Money Moving
The sole person named to the congressional commission,
“Money is moving around in the blink of an eye,” Ramamurti wrote, “and it’s not at all clear what it all means and who it’s helping.”
The coronavirus relief law terminates the special inspector general’s office in five years. That temporary nature is one barrier to attracting and retaining staff, said
“You are asking good people to leave their existing jobs or come out of retirement to work for a temporary agency,” Barofsky said. “The IG needs the flexibility and authority to attract talent.”
Romero said the post she holds is to continue as long as the Troubled Asset Relief Program is spending money. The lack of a deadline helps when mounting complex investigations, she added.
“Investigations can take a long time, particularly criminal investigations, to be able to investigate and then work with DOJ or others to prosecute,” Romero said, referring to the Department of Justice. “So it’s been very helpful for us that we’ve been able to have the time we need.”
Still Spending
The Troubled Asset Relief Program is still spending money -- including $1.8 billion in its most recent fiscal year, with funds going to banks including
Prosecutions for misdeeds continue, too. In February an Illinois banker received a five-year prison term after he admitted to conspiring to receive loans to projects in which he held a personal financial interest, including a real estate project with a golf course and surrounding residential lots.
Other recent cases include embezzlement and wire fraud charges.
Last year, in an audit requested by Senator
In 2010, before a single dollar flowed to homeowners, the
Chocolate Motivation
The culture at the housing finance agency was such that officials could use almost any justification to charge TARP for barbecues, parties, celebrations, restaurant outings, gifts, gym memberships, regular employee meals, and employee cash bonuses, according to the audit that questioned almost $130,000 in spending.
The agency “disagreed with much of the criticism” yet also agreed to return $54,000, Connie Helmlinger, a spokeswoman, said in an interview.
Counselors were at a day-long training session, and “if you have them stay all day, you’re going to feed them,” Helmlinger said. She said the controversy obscures good work by the agency, which helped 30,000 state residents avoid foreclosure.
Spending by the agency included $2,500 for a speaker on Motivation by Chocolate, according to the audit. Helmlinger declined to discuss specific expenditures.
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
John Harney
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.