The retirees didn’t show that they had a vested interest in continued life insurance coverage from the company, Judge Gina M. Groh ruled for the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. The relevant insurance booklets and plan documents had no language clearly and expressly promising a vested right to benefits, Groh said in an Aug. 8 opinion after a two-day bench trial.
The retirees pointed to a 1984 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
