- Comments made in wake of plastics suit are untrue, Exxon says
- Exxon has used courtroom to take on critics in recent months
Exxon accused Bonta, the
“With apparently no appreciation for the irony of their claim, Mr. Bonta and his cohorts are now engaging in reverse greenwashing,” according to the complaint. “While posing under the banner of environmentalism, they do damage to genuine recycling programs and to meaningful innovation.”
Bonta, a Democrat, sued Exxon on behalf of California in September over claims of public nuisance, water pollution and misleading environmental marketing. In a statement at the time, Bonta alleged the company “falsely promoted all plastic as recyclable” when in fact the US recycling rate has never exceeded 9%. Exxon and other manufacturers are also facing
In recent months, Exxon has shown a willingness to use the courts to defend its reputation and legal rights when attacked by critics, especially those focused on the environment. Last year, the company
Exxon sought to continue the suit even after the proposals were withdrawn, claiming to be a
The company claims Bonta made the anti-Exxon statements in a “deliberate smear campaign” in his “personal capacity to drive up donations and publicity for his political campaign.” It also accuses one of the defendants, the Intergenerational Environment Justice Fund Ltd., of serving “private foreign interests” through its relationship with Perth-based
Bonta’s office said the suit is “another attempt from Exxon Mobil to deflect attention from its own unlawful deception” and that the attorney general “looks forward to vigorously litigating this case in court.”
In its own statement, the the Australia-registered non-profit organization Intergenerational Environment Justice Fund said it’s not controlled by Fortescue and its activities in California were to “take action on the issue of plastic waste.”
Fortescue, which is not named as a defendant, rejected Exxon’s assertions in the suit, including the claim it orchestrated litigation to gain a competitive advantage in the low-carbon energy space. The Australian miner is “fully committed” to green hydrogen, a spokesman said in a statement.
The Sierra Club said the suit is “a shameless attempt at intimidation by a multibillion dollar polluter corporation that covered up its climate change denial for decades.”
The Sierra Club has received funding from
(Updates with Sierra Club comment in 11th paragraph.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Doug Alexander
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.