Republicans are splintering over a proposal to create a new 40% tax bracket for those earning $1 million or more as a way to offset a raft of new tax cuts Congress is looking to pass later this year.
House Freedom Caucus Chairman
Harris said in an interview on Monday that he views the millionaires’ tax rate as a “reasonable way to pay for” President
“You are only raising it a couple of points,” the Maryland Republican added. The current top tax rate is 37% for individuals earning more than $626,350 a year.
House leaders downplayed the idea on Tuesday, with Speaker
Representative
Senator
The discussion about a new 40% tax bracket for millionaires comes after decades of Republicans opposing any form of tax increase. But the GOP under Trump has grown more populist, allowing some lawmakers to back away from the party’s long-held stance that tax cuts for top earners and corporations are a prime way to energize the economy.
Earlier:
Congress is seeking to pass an extension of Trump’s first-term overhaul, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, in the coming months. That bill faced a backlash when it passed in 2017 for skewing many of the benefits to large corporations and high-earning Americans.
Republicans are considering a series of new tax cuts, including eliminating taxes on overtime pay and creating new write-offs for older people and car buyers. But fiscal constraints in the legislation mean that lawmakers will have to find either spending reductions or tax increases to offset the cost of their tax priorities.
Harris leads the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, which has several dozen members. The group, which has not taken a public position on a 40% millionaire tax rate, is an influential voting bloc and has the power to block legislation in the House given the Republican Party’s narrow margins in the chamber.
The House as soon as this week could vote on a budget resolution that unlocks the process for Republicans to pass a tax cut bill on GOP votes alone.
Harris is opposed to the Senate version of the budget, arguing it doesn’t require enough spending cuts.
(Updates with opposition from Johnson and Scalise. An AI summary previously at the top of the story was removed to fix an unclear reference to comments from Thom Tillis)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Megan Scully
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.